s 1,2

poltical

Sadvipra Selection System

January 12, 1996

Q: In the inspired writings discussions on sadvipra leadership, the system given is of society drafting a qualified person to assume leadership. But in the published discourse on "Sadvipra Boards", a system is given in which there will be a body of sadvipras that will elect executive, legislative, judicial and administrative sub-boards from among its members. It is not clear how these two systems coincide, as the one gives the general society power to draft sadvipran leadership, and the other locates power of selection with an established body of sadvipras.

The sadvipran board will be composed of those leaders who have proven their outstanding accompllishments and their noble intent. They will be recognized by the people and placed in the leadership. Then they will govern benevolently, but not without provision. Their power will not be unbound. When the elected representatives of the samaj select their leader, they will find one sadvipra, or as close an approximation as can be had. Once this sadvipra is placed in office, he or she shall govern as part of the world confederation. Together these men and women will bring the new society and keep it free and whole. They will govern the military, they will regulate the samajs, they will fix the goals and directions for the earth. They will benevolently govern as a group, and from their midst they will appoint a world leader who will have power equal to the samaj representatives. So this body, from the differing samajs, will become the sadvipran board. They will govern along with their appointed leader. It will be like this.

But their power is not absolute. Should one prove to move against human society in any way, to be corrupt, they will be removed. There is two ways in which they can be removed. One, by voice of the people from the samaj, as every six to ten years there should be a re-evaluation to determine if new leadership is needed, and this should follow democratic process. Secondly, they may be removed by collective vote of the other leaders. Should their fellow leaders observe anti-humanitarian tendencies, they may bring it to the open and call for inquiry. Or should their appointed leader observe, he or she may also call for investigation. If they do not meet the standards, a vote may be called and they may be dismissed, in which case their samaj would again elect a new representative, selecting one of sadvipran tendencies if at all possible.

Q: What about benevolent dictatorship?

Benevolent dictatorship will not be implemented for some time. But in highly developed societies it may be done, as it will be unanimous and there will be no need for election. But that day is not at hand. This electorial system is the best for modern society.