Sadvipra Governing Systems

1991

Q: What is intended by the phrase "dictatorship of the sadvipras" as opposed to "solving all problems great and small in a collective manner"?

The sadvipran era is not within the scope of our present society. Therefore, it is difficult to understand the meaning of this phase. Sadvipras are not individuals motivated by power, greed, or personal desire. They are persons of spiritual depth, persons of spiritual ability. They do not act for self- aggrandizing motives. They act solely for the collective welfare of all entities. They are established in morality and fixed in their intentions. They have no selfish motives. Therefore, their judgment is clear; their decisions of a superior quality. They want only the welfare of all. They are expressing the benevolent will of the Supreme Entity. That is why their decisions should be adhered to by the society at large. That is why they are best suited to lead and to direct the path of others.

Now you may wonder, "Does this mean they should be treated

as gods, their decisions going unquestioned?" They should be scrutinized to determine the extent of their wisdom and compassion. Are they truly established in the divine flow? If it is determined by the collective body that such a leader exists, that such a qualified person is available to give the vision, the direction to the society, then authority should be given to such an individual.

But who should give the authority? The collective body. It is the duty of the members of the collective body to actively come together and determine if such a leader exists. The members should collectively determine their needs and their direction. If a true sadvipra is accessible, if a person of noble character is

available, then the collective should appoint that individual to govern by their consent. They then should follow the lead of such a noble character. If a person of this caliber, a person of spiritual development, is unavailable, the collective should elect a body of persons to represent their interests. This body of individuals should be composed of persons of pure intention. These

elected representatives should collectively govern, taking into account individual differences and personal limitations. They should not lord themselves over anyone, nor should they build their own importance. They must humbly perform their duty and guide the society they govern, applying maximum consideration for collective development.

Now, as certain individuals arise who are established in yama

and niyama, who are established in spiritual knowledge and who

are mentally strong and spiritually developed (over time, such

individuals will come), to these persons should be given authority. Their decisions will be benevolent.

So in a government, the people should collectively speak their opinion, and in coordinated cooperation they should elect a representative body to govern. But if a true sadvipra emerges, they should be placed in the forefront to govern by the benevolent dictatorship. So both approaches should be implemented and will be implemented in future governing bodies.

Q: Are the boards of sadvipras to be elected?

Sadvipra is not elected. By their outstanding qualities, they are known. The collective body is elected. If such an individual or individuals arise within the society, the collective should bring them forward and, through collective decision, appoint them to govern. Right is given to the collective body by the society at large. A sadvipra will not be placed in power by military force or destructive methods. It is unnecessary. Such a person wins the

hearts of many.

Society is not yet evolved sufficiently for this system, but soon it will reach this stage of development. Great leaders will come to power without war or bloodshed. They will unite people with visions of human unity and collective welfare. The society will bring them forward out of necessity. Spirituality will become a valued asset. Persons of this noble and developed nature will be highly revered. They will preach the doctrine of unification. War will become a thing of the past. Collective bodies will exist, but they will yield to the authority of these great persons, all without bloodshed. A true society will be formed. There must be a change in society, a change which will lead to such a benevolent dictatorship.